This InfoGram will be distributed weekly to provide members of the Emergency Services Sector with information concerning the protection of their critical infrastructures. For further information, contact the Emergency Management and Response - Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EMR-ISAC) at (301) 447-1325 or by email at emr-isac@fema.dhs.gov.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Congress are investigating 911 system outages in Virginia and West Virginia caused by the storm system that passed through on June 30th. The outages lasted for hours or days in some regions and affected the 911 availability for more than a million people.
The outage is primarily being blamed on the loss of the commercial power grid due to wind and physical damage. Coupled with the failure and malfunction of the backup-power supplies used by private sector carrier networks, many are questioning some of the practices and policies used to govern the stability or availability of 911 systems.
The overall resiliency of 911 systems relies on many different pieces controlled by several different sectors. This should be a reminder for Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) nationwide to ensure they have a good working relationship with their carrier, that their network carriers have working backup power supplies in place, and those systems are tested or repaired often.
This incident has also served as a wake-up call to legislators, policy makers, and network carriers to make necessary regulatory adjustments to make sure outages like this don’t happen again. The chief of the FCC's public safety and homeland security bureau stated “We should not – and do not – find it acceptable for 911 to be available reliably under normal circumstances…..but not available when a natural disaster occurs.”
The 2011 east coast earthquake was a reminder that planning only for what is most expected is not enough. The quake was felt as far away as Georgia and Toronto, Canada. This year, tornadoes hit Arizona and Queens, NY, hotshot teams from the west were sent to help with wildfires in Virginia and Pennsylvania, and last week Maine had a 4.0 earthquake.
Exceptional events like those above give affected regions a chance to reevaluate their response plans. It also gives the rest of the country an opportunity to apply lessons from the event to their own region and plans, in this case planning for uncommon but high impact events.
Most authorities in the emergency management field suggest reviewing emergency plans at least yearly to make needed changes. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has several hazard mitigation guides which give step-by-step guidance on risk assessment procedures, including Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses.
Ongoing cyber denial of service (DOS) attacks on United States financial institutions and businesses have increased in recent weeks. Most companies reporting being hit are large corporations, possibly because they have the resources in place to identify a cyber attack while smaller companies don’t.
These remarks directly reflect on national security as a whole, but the implications to the Emergency Services Sector should be strongly considered given its dependency on other sectors like water, energy, and communications. Partnerships with other regional stakeholders, joint exercises, planning, and cyber systems evaluations need to be worked out well before another serious national crisis.
2011 saw the highest number of tornado-related fatalities in 1 year since 1936. The National Weather Service’s 2011 assessment (PDF, 4.3 Mb) cited outdoor siren policy and use as an “area of confusion” for communities.
The expected outcome is to gather information from a wide range of siren networks around the country to better understand current realities of siren technology. The survey questions cover things like number and type of sirens, authority having jurisdiction, affected range in miles, and reasons the sirens are used.
People who oversee siren warning systems from all parts of the country are encouraged to complete the survey. The deadline is November 15, 2012. All information provided will be kept confidential and will not be used for any purpose other than academic research.