Providence Fire Department Staffing Study Revisited
By J. Curtis Varone
The Providence Fire Department conducted a staffing study in 1990-1991 to
determine the effect of increased staffing on injury-related costs. Staffing on
the six busiest companies was increased from three members to four. An actuary
concluded that a substantial savings was achieved, resulting in permanent
staffing increases.
The results of the staffing study were
subject to criticism on the basis of participant bias and the Hawthorne Effect,
because participating firefighters knew of the study, and of the possibility for
permanent staffing increases.
The problem prompting this research
was that increased staffing remained highly controversial due to budgetary
problems facing Providence. Politicians and the media regularly referred to the
department as "bloated."
The purpose of this research was to
determine if injury reductions observed during the original staffing study
continued during subsequent years. The historical method was used. The research
questions were:
- What were the results of the staffing
study conducted from September 1, 1990 to February 28, 1991?
- How do the injury reductions observed
during the study period compare with the injuries during the subsequent
years?
- How does time lost during the study
compare with time lost during subsequent years?
- Are there factors other than staffing
that could have affected the results?
A literature review was conducted on
staffing, participant bias, and the Hawthorne Effect. Injury data from the
Department Injury-Exposure Database were analyzed.
The results showed that poststudy
injuries averaged 35.7 percent fewer than control-period injuries; time-loss
injuries averaged 41.9 percent fewer; and time lost was 84 percent lower. The
results supported the conclusion that four-person staffing significantly reduces
the number and severity of injuries compared with three-person staffing, and that
the reductions observed were not the result of participant bias or the Hawthorne
Effect.
Recommendations included the
Providence Fire Department examining injury data for the study companies
annually; an actuary re-examining the economic benefit resulting from the injury
reductions; and the department staffing all companies with four persons.
Additional research was recommended to identify factors causing injuries in
three-person versus four-person companies; validate the results in other fire
departments; and help resolve labor disputes pertaining to staffing in other
departments.