Mitigating wildfire vulnerability: one community's success story

How the Montecito Fire Protection District used a socio-ecological mitigation approach to successfully fight the Thomas Fire

Posted: July 16, 2019

Share on: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
wildfire threatens home
Photo: State Farm

The Thomas Fire in December 2017 claimed two lives, burned 281,893 acres, and destroyed more than 1,000 structures before it was contained on Jan. 12, 2018. The Montecito Fire Protection District (MFPD), a small coastal community in California, saw the loss of only seven structures, a remarkably low number given the extreme fire behavior it experienced. The low fire loss was due to the successful mitigation strategies the Montecito community pursued for over two decades beginning in 1994.

Planning for wildfire vulnerability

Factors contributing to wildfire vulnerability are both social and ecological. To be successful, communities need to plan for:

  1. Exposure vulnerability – What are the fuel conditions in your area? You need a program to reduce the flammability of building materials used in construction and reduce fuel on public and private lands, as well as in the home ignition zone.
  2. Sensitivity of the exposed community – What are your residents; vulnerabilities? You need to determine the risk factors of your population, such as poverty, age, education, language and special needs.
  3. Adaptive capacity – Can your residents prepare for, respond to and recover from a wildfire based on their available resources?

MFPD’s pre-fire mitigation activities

You need to know in advance about the special needs of your community and plan for them. Pre-fire activities create relationships with residents that are important to protect your community.

The MFPD used a wide range of pre-fire mitigation activities to address the three socio-ecological factors contributing to wildfire vulnerability. Here are some of the highlights:

Staffing increases

The MFPD created wildland fire specialist positions which helped to address all three areas of wildfire vulnerability in the community:

  • Exposure vulnerability – Worked with residents to reduce flammability in their community.
  • Sensitivity vulnerability – Worked with residents to develop trust; share information; learn about special needs, economic and language barriers within the community; and improve evacuation preparedness based on these assessments.
  • Adaptive capacity – Worked with homeowners to reduce the risk of their home burning and increase defensible space around their homes. If residents had difficulty paying for the improvements, the specialist helped find grant money or other free or inexpensive measures.

Fuel reduction

Several of the MFPD's mitigation activities related specifically to reducing exposure vulnerability, including:

  • A partnership with a local utility company to remove dead trees near power infrastructure.
  • Clearing and thinning understory and creating shaded fuel breaks on private property.
  • Sponsoring a neighborhood chipping program where residents removed wood to the end of their driveways and MFPD contractors chipped it and hauled it away.
  • Conducting defensible space surveys and making related improvements.
  • Completing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) which determined what areas would be most prone to ember-cast and where additional fuel reduction efforts were needed.
  • Reducing roadside fuels along strategic, private roadways to improve rapid ingress and egress and to widen fire lines.

Pre-attack zones

MFPD identified pre-attack zones for evacuation planning and maps showing water supply and equipment staging areas.

Fire-resistant building codes

The MFPD changed the building codes to ban cedar shakes for roofing and siding, require boxed eaves, and create a new requirement for wider driveways. Wider driveways help residents to evacuate faster. They also provide turnaround space for large fire apparatus leading to faster, safer ingress and egress.

Community buy-in

Everyone in the community must buy-in for a comprehensive mitigation plan to work. MFPD was very active in its public outreach efforts, so residents could recognize the danger of wildfire, trust the authorities and evacuate when asked to.

MFPD's hard work pays off

When the Thomas Fire evacuation was ordered on Dec. 10, nearly all MFPD residents complied. Evacuations did not hinder fire suppression activities because they took place in advance of the fire. Containment lines and fire-retardant lines were put in place in critical areas. They sprayed water on homes and nearby vegetation and employed fire following-tactics to safeguard property.

Firefighters were aided by defensive landscaping and code changes that made homes fire resistant. With enough defensible space around properties, they were less concerned about risk of entrapment. The reduction of roadside fuels helped ensure safe passage of large fire apparatus through the area in both directions on narrow roads.

The CWPP and pre-attack zone mapping gave firefighters a clearer picture of the critical areas. Firefighters had more time to prepare but the pre-fire exposure reduction strategies paid dividends in lessening the fire fuels and making the suppression activities more effective.

Learn more about this research

Summary information for this article was provided by the NETC Library. Read the entire article.

Kolden, C. and Henson, C. (2019). A socio-ecological approach to mitigating wildfire vulnerability in the Wildland Urban Interface: a case study from the 2017 Thomas Fire. Fire: 2 (1), 9.

This summary is for informational purposes only. More +
As such, the content does not reflect any official positions, policies, or guidelines on behalf of the sender, the U.S. Fire Administration, FEMA, DHS, nor any other federal agencies, departments or contracting entities. Similarly, this summary does not represent in any manner an official endorsement or relationship to any private or public companies, organizations/associations, or any authors or individuals cited or websites associated within the article.

Explore more articles:


Using nanotechnology to minimize fire damage

Posted: April 10, 2019

Nanotechnology, manufactured at scale and low cost while posing minimal health risks, may potentially point to a future with fewer fires that are less lethal and less damaging.

sprained knee

Mitigating fireground injury risks: Suggested interventions

Posted: Aug. 30, 2018

Firefighting poses many hazards that come in a wide variety of work settings. A recent study focused on the scope and nature of fireground injuries to determine what steps fire departments can take to better mitigate hazards posed by certain risks.

firefighters removing SCBA

Firefighter burnout and workplace safety

Posted: July 26, 2018

Are firefighters who show symptoms of burnout less likely to follow safety procedures? A team of researchers recently set out to learn if burnout impacted a firefighter’s ability to follow required safe work practices.

firefighters walking away in PPE after a fire

Clean gear is the new badge of honor

Posted: April 5, 2018

This article looks at firefighter perceptions of dirty gear and how Palm Beach County Fire Rescue promoted organizational resilience to combat the risk of firefighter cancer from dirty gear.

firefighter undergoing vo2 max testing

Testing for metabolic syndrome in firefighters

Posted: Dec. 21, 2017

Results of a recent study to see whether resting heart rate and heart rate reserve could be reliable predictors of metabolic syndrome in firefighters when VO2 max testing is not available.

suburban neighborhood

Identifying community fire risk using geographic mapping

Posted: Dec. 14, 2017

Researchers using GIS software evaluated a local fire safety intervention program to see if the residents selected for the program were actually living in areas with the highest fire risk. Here’s what they found.

fire extinguisher

38 million Kidde fire extinguishers recalled

Posted: Nov. 6, 2017

Kidde has announced a recall of almost 38 million fire extinguishers. They may not work during a fire emergency if they become clogged and require a lot of force to use.

firefighters wearing PPE

PPE use and unsafe actions by firefighters

Posted: Sept. 28, 2017

What causes firefighters to take unsafe actions related to personal protective equipment (PPE) use — even though they know they should be doing the opposite? A team of researchers led by Drexel University’s Center for Firefighter Injury Research and Safety Trends recently set out to understand why this occurs and what the fire service can do to fix it.

EMS workers treating a patient at a protest

Violence against EMS responders

Posted: Aug. 31, 2017

Findings from a research project that investigated injuries to paramedics and emergency medical technicians from patient-initiated violence.